Archive

Posts Tagged ‘download’

Avatar: review of reviews of James Cameron’s 3D space opera

December 20, 2009 18CARATBRASS 5 comments

Avatar: review of reviews of James Cameron’s 3D space opera

Avatar, James Cameron’s 3D spectacular, had its world premiere in London last night. Stand by for the official verdict from the Guardian, but the shock of the night is that everyone else seems to have loved it

Avatar

It’s going to be titanic … Avatar

A fortnight ago it all looked so different. An early review of selected footage from James Cameron’s space opera, posted anonymously on Gawker, comprehensively panned what had been hailed as a game-changingly ambitious and successful foray into the world of 3D. Avatar, said the writer, apparently an industry insider, was “literally vomit inducing”. Despite some “beautiful moments”, concluded the review, “overall it’s a horrible piece of shit”.

  • Avatar
  • Production year: 2009
  • Country: USA
  • Cert (UK): 12A
  • Runtime: 161 mins
  • Directors: James Cameron
  • Cast: CCH Pounder, Giovanni Ribisi, Michelle Rodriguez, Sam Worthington, Sigourney Weaver, Stephen Lang, Zoe Saldana
  • More on this film

This morning, the first official reviews are in, and the anticipated sneers, jeers and retches have been gazumped by notices that will afford the poster designers an embarrassment of riches. “Bottom Line: A titanic entertainment – movie magic is back!” ran the first line of the Hollywood Reporter’s rave.

“A dozen years later,” it continues – referring to 1997’s game-changing Titanic, “James Cameron has proven his point: He is king of the world.” The trade paper’s chief critic, Kirk Honeycutt, goes on to call the film a “jaw-dropping wonder”, and to praise all aspects of the film, from the acting to the special effects to the pace (never flagging, apparently). There will be no danger of Twentieth Century Fox failing to recoup their investment, he concludes. The only note of caution is wondering how Cameron can ever top this?

Every one of the 10 reviews listed on reviews aggregator Rotten Tomatoes gives it a “fresh” rating. Hollywood bible Variety, whose newly-introduced paywall doesn’t seem to impede access to its review, raises a few more doubts: there’s a certain lack of explanation, and the politics are foggy. But the experience, says Todd McCarthy, is “all-enveloping and transporting”. He even quashes doubts about the dramatic plausibility of the alien Na’vi race, whose unusual appearance has been unfavourably compared with Smurfs: “But once they’re introduced in the context of the picture, these blue-skinned, yellow-eyed creatures quickly become captivating, even sexy, with their rangy height, slim and elongated bodies and skimpy wardrobe.” Special praise is reserved for Sigourney Weaver, as “a scientist so unimpeachable that she can get away with smoking on board an intergalactic spaceship”.

We’ll presumably have to wait until next Thursday, when the film is released, to hear the opinion of newly-appointed film critic Alex Zane in the Sun, as last night’s verdict was delivered by his anonymous predecessor, the Sneak. Still, one doesn’t feel he need fear the wrath of the publicists too much: “It’s unashamedly populist. Just like Titanic,” he tells readers, before reassuring them: “But don’t worry. This isn’t a preachy story. It’s big action. The only reason that Avatar won’t top Titanic at the box office is that there are not enough digital screens around the world to show it in all its 3D wonder.” The Sneak rounds things up with a shout-out to Avatar’s studio, Fox, part of the Murdoch News International empire that, happily, also owns the Sun: “But you have to admire the film’s backers for being brave enough to take a risk on funding such ground-breaking technology. The Sneak’s advice is to make sure you can say you were there when the future of cinema began.”

Their News Corp sister paper the Times contains a more qualified rave by film critic Wendy Ide, that doesn’t detract from the Sun’s enthusiasm but does sound the odd note of caution. In a four-star review, Ide describes “a world that takes a little getting used to,” referencing Cameron’s nods to both Hayao Miyazaki and naff Aussie animation FernGully: The Last Rainforest – early reviews of the trailer had also been struck by the similarity. “At times,” admits Ide, “it verges on the tacky, like a futuristic air freshener advertisement with the colour contrast turned up to the max”.

“Actually rather good,” was the Independent’s take: Anna Keir confirmed that you could sit through it without feeling ill, though she admitted such a long stretch in 3D does lead to some eye-rubbing.

That Empire felt moved to give Avatar five stars was less of a shock, though reviewer Chris Hewitt does manage to contain himself long enough to take a pop at the Leona Lewis’s closing credits theme tune (“bloody awful”) and the “New Age-y, hippy-dippy language and images that suggest that Cameron is one mung bean away from dropping out, man, and going all Swampy on our asses”. He’s also the only reviewer to point out “a fair amount of unintentional laughter [to be] had from watching hundreds of Na’vi, swaying like extras from the Zion rave scene in The Matrix Reloaded, surrounding something called the Tree Of Souls and banging on about becoming one with Mother Eywo … But it’s hard to imagine even the most jaded and cynical having any issues with the last forty minutes, in which Cameron uncorks the action and shows all the young pretenders – the Bays and the Emmerichs and the Von Triers – how it’s done.”

Has his enthusiasm got the better of him? You can see how Michael Bay or Roland Emmerich would be green with jealousy. But Avatar directed by Lars Von Trier? That would be a real game-changer.

BUY AVATAR & RELATED AVATAR MERCHANDISE FROM AMAZON >>>

What they’re saying about Avatar on Twitter

PeterSHall: “The gut reaction is to be overwhelmed by the level of detail, but the more I write about it, the more I like about it.”

Chase Whale: “This is a giant step forward. I just hope every other filmmaker has $500 million to spend.”

Aint It Cool News’ C Robert Cargill: “It was pretty great…if by pretty great I mean OMFGHOLYFUCKINGSHITOMGOMGOMG. Because that’s what it was.”

Peter Sciretta from /Film: “I’m not allowed to say anything about what I thought of Avatar, but saw it in a screening room with neill blomkamp, who didn’t sign an NDA. He loved it… I will say this, it’s hard to disagree with Neil :)

Simon Pegg: Avatar …………………… tweetless. Just tweetless in the best possible way. Just left the party. The movie is a game changer. Still buzzing. Tweet over.

Rage Against The Machine 36,000 Sales Ahead Of X Factor’s Joe McElderry!

December 17, 2009 18CARATBRASS 11 comments
Rage Against The Machine 36,000 Sales Ahead Of X Factor's Joe McElderry!
Rage Against The Machine are still ahead of X Factor’s Joe McElderry in the Christmas chart race, despite the physical copy of the 18-year-olds single going on sale yesterday.
‘Killing In The Name’ has shifted 253,476 downloads compared to ‘The Climb’s meagre 216,795 – which includes his physical sales.

Although yesterday’s lead of 65,000 has been cut to 36,000 it’s still a positive step considering industry experts’ predictions that the physical format would claw things back for McElderry.

Fans of the Facebook led campaign have until midnight on Saturday night / Sunday morning to download the track in their droves.

As well as Tom Morello donating some of the proceeds to Youth Music, Jon and Tracy Morter, who founded the Facebook campaign, have set up a Justgiving page for Shelter which you can pledge to HERE

NEWS: Rage Against The Machine sing ‘Fuck You I Won’t Do What You Tell Me’ live on the BBC!

SUPPORT THE RAGE! – Spare change, to change the chart! (FACEBOOK GROUP – http://www.facebook.com/home.php#/group.php?gid=2228594104&ref=ts OR http://www.facebook.com/group.php?v=wall&ref=nf&gid=37655682127 )

AMAZON – YES IT DOES COUNT – ONLY 29p

http://bit.ly/ratm-amazon

iTUNES – 99p – track #2 (click on ‘view in itunes’ on the right)
http://bit.ly/ratm-itunes

PLAY.COM – 65p – it’s the only track on the page
http://bit.ly/ratm-play

7DIGITAL – £1.19P – track #2
http://bit.ly/ratm-7digital

HMV.COM – 79p (careful – this is track #1)
http://bit.ly/ratm-hmv

TUNETRIBE – 49P – track #2 – LIVE version (yes it counts)
http://bit.ly/ratm-tunetribe
or
http://bit.ly/rage-tunetribe (Studio Version)

TESCO DIGITAL – 67p – track #2
http://bit.ly/ratm-tesco

WE7 – £1.07p – track #2
http://bit.ly/ratm-we7

Rage Against The XFactor – Rage Against The Machine for Christmas Number 1 #RATM

December 14, 2009 18CARATBRASS 2 comments

Why a Rage Against the Machine Christmas No 1 would be a great pop moment

If the sweary, shouty rap-rock mob prove to have the X(mas) factor it will be a victory for the democratised and downloadable nature of the pop charts in 2009

Simon Cowell and Rage Against the Machine
Rage against the pop machine … Zack de la Rocha gives Simon Cowell the finger. Photograph: Ken McKay/Chiaki Nozu/Rex/FilmMagic

What a lot of outrage over something so silly. In the fight for Christmas No 1 (and that’s a phrase we’ve not heard in a long time), familiar battle lines have been drawn.

In the rock corner, we have those who are “protesting” against Simon Cowell’s parade of X Factor winners hogging the top spot, and want to unleash something loud and sweary on the charts – Rage Against the Machine’s Killing in the Name.

In the pop corner, we have those who think RATM fans are being pathetic, especially as the song is ancient and the band are hardly rock rebels these days (you can read some good points about the irony of using Killing in the Name for this campaign on Luke Lewis’s NME blog).

Personally, I’d love RATM to get to No 1, not because I think it would be a victory for “proper” rock. I actually think a RATM victory would be a triumph for pop. The song might be old, but having a fan-powered campaign propel it to the chart summit against the might of an entertainment powerhouse like SyCo would tell you more about the democratised, downloadable and downright free-for-all nature of the pop charts in 2009 than anything else. And besides, surely any kind of scrap for the top spot is better for pop lovers than none at all?

Critics have pointed out that Sony is behind both acts, and that ultimately the money will find its way to Cowell whoever wins. But that’s missing the point. Cowell hardly needs the cash that a Christmas No 1 would generate. But he does need – at least to some degree – to show that the X Factor brand can guarantee its winner a chart topper. Besides this, Cowell’s claim that a RATM No 1 would “spoil” it for the other contestants betrays a certain arrogance, as if the Christmas top slot is now reserved for his acts alone and that any other artist actually selling more records is cheating.

One familiar message-board criticism is that RATM fans are being childish and should “protest about something serious”, presumably landmines, climate change or youth unemployment. That’s a perfectly fair point, but if you’re going to take that viewpoint you could apply it to the act of buying pop singles in general. You’re paying 79p for a Joe McElderry ballad? Give the money to Katine instead, you thoughtless twerp! Again, the point is to not take it all so seriously. The Christmas chart is a bit of a laugh. People like to spend their money on having a laugh.

So, do I think RATM have the X(mas) factor? I can’t quite see it happening, but it would certainly be amusing if they did (the song has a special place in my heart, as I first heard it during that infamous Bruno Brookes chart rundown in 1992, shortly before picking up the shattered remains of my jaw from the floor).

When we look back in a decade’s time, and ask why an old rock song from the early 1990s went to No 1 in 2009, sticking out in a long line of overblown ballads like the proverbial sore middle finger … to me, that’s what the pop charts were made for.

Credit – guardian.co.uk

SUPPORT THE RAGE! – Spare change, to change the chart! (FACEBOOK GROUP – http://www.facebook.com/home.php#/group.php?gid=2228594104&ref=ts OR http://www.facebook.com/group.php?v=wall&ref=nf&gid=37655682127 )

AMAZON – YES IT DOES COUNT – ONLY 29p

http://bit.ly/ratm-amazon

iTUNES – 99p – track #2 (click on ‘view in itunes’ on the right)
http://bit.ly/ratm-itunes

PLAY.COM – 65p – it’s the only track on the page
http://bit.ly/ratm-play

7DIGITAL – £1.19P – track #2
http://bit.ly/ratm-7digital

HMV.COM – 79p (careful – this is track #1)
http://bit.ly/ratm-hmv

TUNETRIBE – 49P – track #2 – LIVE version (yes it counts)
http://bit.ly/ratm-tunetribe
or
http://bit.ly/rage-tunetribe (Studio Version)

TESCO DIGITAL – 67p – track #2
http://bit.ly/ratm-tesco

WE7 – £1.07p – track #2
http://bit.ly/ratm-we7

WARNING : AMY LEE – The New Evanescence ‘We Are The Fallen’ are coming for you!

July 14, 2009 18CARATBRASS 1 comment
We Are The Fallen - The New Evanescence

We Are The Fallen - The New Evanescence?

American Idol powerhouse vocalist Carly Smithson is joining the original guys of Evanescence, who are relaunching as a hard-rock band called We Are The Fallen. (www.WeAreTheFallen.com)

They’ll make a formal announcement Monday in Hollywood, with a news conference and their first live performance. Debut song Bury Me Alive will be available at that time for free download at wearethefallen.com.

The lineup consists of Smithson and three of the four original members of Evanescence — guitarists Ben Moody and John LeCompt and drummer Rocky Gray — as well as bassist Marty O’Brien, whose recording and touring credits include Disturbed and Kelly Clarkson.

“This all happened by accident,” says Smithson, who sang Evanescence’s Bring Me to Life during the 2008 Idols Live tour. She’s friends with Moody’s housemate, Monique Morrison. “I met him once or twice (at the house) before the band thing,” says Smithson, who had been working on a solo project.

Though Smithson and Moody both shared similar visions with Morrison for bands they wanted to form, Moody wasn’t ready to bite.

“I’m sometimes hard-headed, and it took me a while” to give the Idol a shot, Moody says. But when another artist persuaded him to check out YouTube videos of Smithson performing, “I just kind of freaked out.”

Moody called Morrison and asked her to arrange a meeting. “She happened to be with Carly and said, ‘We’ll be there in 20 minutes.’

“Carly is a rock star,” he adds. “She was one of us.”

She isn’t the first Idol to attract the interest of an established act: Season 5 finalist Chris Daughtry turned down an offer to become Fuel’s frontman. But Smithson jumped at her chance. “The first time we rehearsed, everybody started in on this jam of Iron Maiden. I was like, ‘I’m in a band! I love this!’ “

The new group’s name alludes to Evanescence’s 2003 major-label debut album, Fallen, which has sold 7 million copies in the USA.

Dont worry Amy, I still love you :)

Dont worry Amy, I still love you :)

Moody left Evanescence shortly after Fallen, citing creative differences with singer Amy Lee. LeCompt and Gray followed in 2007. Lee continues to perform under the Evanescence name, though the group hasn’t released an album since 2006.

The Fallen plans to tour in September and initially will release its songs in small doses every few months, Moody says, “so there’s always new music and new reasons to come to another show.”

BURY ME ALIVE – LIVE – WE ARE THE FALLEN

Note : I am and always will be a fan of Evanescence and Amy Lee. In fact I believe I could quiet happily die should the day ever come that Amy Lee comes back to my bed :)

However, a few things…

Amy Lee seems to have been slowly making the ban more and more about herself rather than the music. If you want to make your own music …. go solo? As for Ben Moody’s Evanescence Mach 2 I have listened to Bury Me Alive and it is back to that perfect formula of hauntingly sexy female vocals blended with stunning lyrics and the perfect rock cacoon, I wish you well and as a Download Festival fan I would love to see these 2 go head to head on stage at 2010 or any coming festivals for the matter.

We Are the Fallen – Single Download – Necrocarcass >>>

EVANESCENCE – DOWNLOAD – ALBUMS & SINGLES >>>

WANT A FREE DAILY DOSE OF FUNNY STORIES AND REVIEWS? – CLICK THE SUBSCRIBE BUTTON TOP RIGHT